Loading...

501 posters, 2 videos, 1 audios, 8 topics, 37 sessions, 395 authors, 307 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024

November 21-23, 2024 | Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 banner

5831

SI-6603 (CONDOLIASE) IN RADICULAR LEG PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Part of Topic

Scientific Abstracts > Chronic Pain

SI-6603 (Condoliase) in Patients With Radicular Leg Pain Associated With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

-Lumbar disc herniation (LDH), the displacement of disc material (nucleus pulposus) beyond the intervertebral disc space, is a leading cause of radicular leg pain1 

-Prolonged duration of LDH symptoms (ie, >6 months) is associated with worse outcomes2,3 , highlighting the clinical importance of rapid symptom control

-SI-6603 (condoliase) is a novel chemonucleolytic enzyme with high substrate specificity for degrading glycosaminoglycans (primarily chondroitin sulfate) in the nucleus pulposus4,5

-Condoliase was approved in Japan in 2018 as a single intradiscal injection for the treatment of radicular leg pain associated with LDH6,7

-The Discovery 6603 study (NCT03607838) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind,
sham-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intradiscal injection of condoliase for radicular leg pain in individuals with LDH in the United States (US)
-We report efficacy and safety findings from the Discovery 6603 study, including efficacy outcomes preceding the primary endpoint timepoint of Week 13
 
STUDY DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

-Participants were randomized 1:1 to a single intradiscal injection of condoliase (1.25 units) or sham injection (Figure 1)

-Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 30 to 70 years with contained posterolateral LDH, chief complaint of unilateral radiculopathy/radicular leg pain, and ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment

-Among 352 randomized participants, 341 constituted the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (assigned treatment: condoliase: 169; sham: 172; Table 1) and the safety population (treatment received: condoliase: 167; sham: 174)

-Primary endpoint: Change from baseline (CFB) to Week 13 in worst leg pain score during the past 24 hours averaged over the previous 7 days, as assessed by 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS)

-Key secondary endpoints: CFB in average worst leg pain at Week 52, herniation volume at Week 13, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at Week 13

-Supportive endpoint: Percentage of participants with negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and 50% responder rates (participants with ≥50% improvement from baseline) for worst leg pain

-Primary and key secondary endpoint analyses used mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)

  -A serial gatekeeping algorithm was used, wherein if the primary endpoint was significant at α=0.05, Week 52 worst leg pain would be evaluated, followed by Week 13 herniation volume, then Week 13 ODI score
 
  -If an endpoint failed to meet significance, then the algorithm was halted, and all remaining tests were declared nonsignificant
 
RESULTS

-Condoliase showed significantly greater improvement in worst leg pain at Week 13
(LSM CFB: –41.7) vs sham (–34.2; LSM difference: –7.5; 95% CI: –14.1, – 0.9; p=0.0263; Figure 2)

-The treatment group difference in CFB in worst leg pain at Week 52 favored condoliase but did not achieve significance

-CFB in herniation volume (LSM CFB condoliase: –103.8; sham: –78.1; LSM difference: –25.8) and ODI score (Figure 3) at Week 13 were considered not significant regardless of their p values

-Notable differences in 50% responders for worst leg pain favored condoliase at Week 4, Week 6, Week 13, and Week 26 (Figure 4)

-A higher percentage of participants in the condoliase group (vs sham) had a negative SLR test beginning at Week 1, which was sustained to Week 52 (Figure 5)

-Post-treatment surgery for LDH at the same level of injection was numerically more frequent in the sham group (6.4%; n=11) vs the condoliase group (3.0%; n=5)

 

KEY TAKEAWAYS

-Condoliase significantly improved radicular leg pain at Week 13 (vs sham) in participants with LDH
-Condoliase was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events
-Condoliase was associated with rapid improvements (≤6 weeks) in leg pain and neurological findings
-Condoliase may offer a nonsurgical treatment option for patients with LDH
23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.