Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty with Spinal vs. General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Analysis 

Despite longstanding debate surrounding anesthesia in total joint arthroplasty, the topic remains controversial, and an optimal anesthetic mode has yet to be clearly identified. Historically, general anesthesia (GA) was recommended for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA); however, in more recent years, spinal anesthesia (SA) has become more popular, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. Although multiple investigators have explored this topic, their conclusions are conflicting. Some studies have reported increased incidence of hypotension, motor blockade, urinary retention, and pruritis with SA. On the other hand, some authors have reported increased blood loss, length of hospital stay, nausea, infection, and thromboembolic events with GA. 

In comparison, hip fracture literature does not demonstrate superiority of SA or GA with multiple authors concluding that both methods are viable and comparable in morbidity and mortality. This difference in reporting is interesting considering the similarities between THA and hip fracture repair. Therefore, despite previous studies examining anesthesia techniques in total joint arthroplasty, there is more room to explore this topic. 

The purpose of this study is to further investigate the relationship between total joint arthroplasty outcomes and anesthesia type in order to determine if there is a significant difference in morbidity and mortality between patients undergoing spinal anesthesia compared with those undergoing general anesthesia during primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.