Loading...

2,281 posters, 63 videos, 56 audios, 43 topics, 18 sessions, 6,174 authors, 2,323 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

RCOG World Congress 2025

June 23 - 25, 2025 | ExCeL London, UK

EP.1341

External validation of the ECSIL model for predicting caesarean delivery after IOL

Part of Topic

Intrapartum care

External Validation of the Clinical Prediction Model (ECSIL) for Caesarean Delivery After Induction of Labour in Singleton Pregnancies at Term Gestation

Garima Yadav, Anjana Mathur, Manisha Dorwal, Meenakshi Gothwal, Priyanka Khaturia, Pratibha Singh 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India


Background

The caesarean section (CS) rate in India has increased from 3% in 1992–93 to 21.5% in 2019–21¹. With rising CS rates following induction of labour (IOL), personalised risk prediction is crucial to reduce unnecessary interventions and improve outcomes. Although several predictive models exist, few have been externally validated across diverse populations2-3. 

The ECSIL model, based on maternal demographics, medical history, and cervical examination, aims to predict the likelihood of CS.  


Objective

To externally validate the ECSIL model (developed by Dorwal et al.4) to predict emergency CS following IOL in singleton term pregnancies.

Methodology
  • Design: Prospective observational study

  • Setting: AIIMS Jodhpur

  • Duration: July 2023 – March 2024

  • Inclusion Criteria: Term (37–42 weeks), singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation and unfavourable cervix (Bishop score ≤6), undergoing IOL for medical/obstetric indications

  • Exclusion Criteria: Favourable cervix (Bishop score >6), multifetal gestation, uterine scar, malpresentation, abnormal placentation, distorted pelvis, infections, malignancy, fetal demise, hypersensitivity to dinoprostone, hydrocephalus, and non-reassuring fetal status at IOL initiation.

  • Variables used in the prediction model ( parity, membrane sweep at term, cervical dilation, cervical consistency, cervical length, fetal station, cervical position, patient height, and weight gain during pregnancy) were extracted from medical records to calculate individual CS risk. The accuracy of the ECSIL calculator was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Study Population
 
During the study period, 645 women underwent IOL; 500 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. 145 were excluded as shown in Figure 2.
 
Results:

Statistical Analysis:

  • Software: MedCalc Statistical Software v23.0

  • Method: ROC analysis to assess ECSIL predictive accuracy

AUC: 0.913 → Excellent discriminatory power

Sensitivity: 89.08% → Correctly identifies CS cases

Specificity: 84.97% → Correctly identifies non-CS cases

Cut-off probability: >0.416 → Threshold above which CS is likely

95% Confidence Interval for AUC: 0.885 – 0.936

P-value: <0.0001 → Statistically significant
 
 
Conclusion
 
The ECSIL model demonstrates high accuracy in predicting cesarean sections following IOL. 

The high sensitivity ensures that most cases requiring cesarean sections are correctly identified, while the good specificity minimizes unnecessary interventions. 

The model is effective for clinical use, but further validation in different populations is recommended to confirm its applicability across diverse groups.


Reference

  1. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) 2019-21: India. Natl Fam Health Surv India. 2021. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/ 

  2. Rossi RM, Requarth E, Warshak CR, et al. Risk calculator to predict cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction of labour. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):559-568.

  3. Jochum F, Le Ray C, Blanc-Petitjean P, et al. Externally validated score to predict caesarean delivery after labor induction with cervix ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(3):502-510. 

  4. Dorwal M, Yadav G, Singh P, et al. Deriving a prediction model for emergency cesarean delivery following induction of labor in singleton term pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;00(0):1-9


Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.