457 posters, 2 videos, 2 audios, 8 topics, 45 sessions, 401 authors, 265 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
49th Annual Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine Meeting
March 21-23, 2024 | The Hilton Bayfront San Diego | San Diego, California

5626
TELEMEDICINE PRACTICE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON NEUROSURGERY REFERRALS AMONG PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN
Poster Presenter
Authors
Affiliations
Part of Topic
Scientific Abstracts > Chronic Pain
In-person vs Telemedicine Image Referral Patterns for Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain
Authors: David R. Schulze, DO, MS, Ryan Alano, MD, MPH, Derek Bui, DO
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered many aspects of medical practice. One of those changes was a greater reliance on telemedicine. At that time, it was a relatively newer practice, and the current research on the differences between in-person vs telemedicine appointments was limited. This study aimed to see if there is a difference between the amount and type of radiographic images ordered for new patients presenting with a chief complaint of low back pain when comparing in-person vs telephone appointments.
Design: This retrospective cohort study looked at the difference in the percentage of total imaging ordered among in-person vs telephone visits with further subdivisions, including lumbar MRIs, lumbar X-rays, and cervical MRIs among 542 Veterans.
The main outcome measure was the difference in the percentage of total imaging ordered among in-person vs telephone visits with further subdivisions, including lumbar MRIs, lumbar X-rays, and cervical MRIs.
Setting: Multi-campus outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic.
Participants: Female and male veterans
Results:
Total imaging: In Person 28.81%; Telephone 25.22%;
P-value 0.447; Chi Square 0.578
Lumbar MRIs: In Person: 63.41%; Telephone 65.52%;
P-value 0.832; Chi Square 0.045
Lumbar X-rays: In Person: 32.52%; Telephone 41.38%;
P-value 0.366; Chi Square 0.818
Cervical MRIs: In Person 9.76%; Telephone 13.79%;
P-value 0.524; Chi Square 0.406
Results: There was no statistically significant difference noted among total imaging, lumbar MRIs, lumbar X-rays or cervical MRIs ordered when comparing in person to telephone visits.
Conclusions: While there are many differences between in-person and telemedicine visits, this study suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in the percentage of total imaging, lumbar MRIs, lumbar X-rays, or cervical MRIs ordered when comparing in-person to telephone visits when seeing a patient for their initial visit for low back pain. This study is limited in that there might be additional factors or symptoms that could have led to the ordering of referrals or images. The findings of this study can help us better understand how telemedicine might affect medical practice going forward, but more research is needed to better understand this new normal.
