457 posters, 2 videos, 2 audios, 8 topics, 45 sessions, 401 authors, 265 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
49th Annual Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine Meeting
March 21-23, 2024 | The Hilton Bayfront San Diego | San Diego, California

5509
EVALUATING THE USE OF SUBLINGUAL SUFENTANIL IN PATIENTS ON BUPRENORPHINE TREATMENT UNDERGOING AMBULATORY SURGERY: A CASE SERIES.
Poster Presenter
Part of Topic
Scientific Abstracts > Acute Pain
Evaluating the use of sublingual sufentanil in patients with buprenorphine treatment who are undergoing ambulatory surgery: A Prospective Case Series
Authors: Kateryna Slinchenkova1 BA, Elilary Montilla Medrano2 MD, Adam S. Yedlin2 MD, Preeti Anand2 MD, Karina Gritsenko2 MD, Sofia Steinberg2 DO, Kathryn Breidenbach2 MD, Sarang Koushik3 MD, Naum Shaparin2 MD
Affiliations: 1. New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Valleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Background
One of the long-term management options to avoid opioid use relapse is to include an opioid agonist (methadone or buprenorphine) in the management regime. (1,2) The number of Medicaid-covered prescriptions for buprenorphine containing products for treatment has increased 5-fold from 2011 to 2018. (3) Since the guideline change in 2021, providers no longer need additional training or licensure to prescribe buprenorphine, so prescription numbers and access to this medication have an expectation to increase further. Recommendations for perioperative treatment of patients on suboxone have varied in recent years, with many discussions on a need for discontinuation or tapering of dose due to the potential for pain control difficulties. (4) Recent guidelines have pivoted to suggest that buprenorphine should be continued, and postoperative pain management can be achieved with the focused utilization of regional anesthesia and IV non-opioid anesthesia, with opioids acting as a supplement. Nevertheless, conversion to methadone or morphine is noted as an option to avoid difficulties.(5) A multimodal approach to analgesia and communication with prescribing provider is recommended. (6) There is a known concern that increased IV medication and increased opioid need to achieve pain control can lead to adverse effects such as nausea, respiratory depression, and more. Furthermore, the need for this intervention may increase patient length of stay and require increased monitoring. One potential medication that may assist with such issues is sufentanil.
Overall, a literature review of the sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) found it to be an excellent treatment for chronic pain patients, reducing the need for IV medication. (7) In non-opioid tolerant patients, it has shown great success. Two randomized trials of different SST dosages showed that it significantly reduced pain intensity. Both studies indicated an increased rate of nausea for those not in the placebo group. (8, 9) Lower PACU opioid administration was noted (10) and those receiving sublingual sufentanil experienced less oxygen desaturation below 95% (p=0.028). (11) No research is currently available on the efficacy of sublingual sufentanil in opioid-tolerant patients.
Methods and Materials
Patients were screened using a weekly patient report of upcoming surgeries. Patients meeting the following criteria were approached for study participation:
Patients meeting criteria were called prior to surgery to offer participation in the study. Informed consent discussion was done over phone and written consent was obtained the morning of surgery.
|
Inclusion Criteria |
Exclusion Criteria |
|
Aged 18-100 |
Known allergic reactions to sublingual sufentanil |
|
Currently taking buprenorphine or buprenorphine containing medication for opioid use disorder |
Severe respiratory illness |
|
ASA Physical Score 1-3 |
Significant intraoperative hemodynamic instability |
|
Surgery done under general anesthesia |
Use of regional Anesthesia techniques |
|
Able to provide signed informed consent |
The study was IRB-approved by Einstein IRB and sponsored by AcelRx Pharmaceuticals as an investigator-initiated trial. All three patients enrolled received 975mg acetaminophen preoperatively, and standardized general anesthesia, as per site protocol. The sublingual sufentanil tablet was administered by the attending anesthesiologist immediately following induction of general anesthesia.
Patients were evaluated for adverse effects upon entering recovery, an hour after recovery start, and 24 hours after discharge.
Cases
|
Patient 1 |
Patient 2 |
Patient 3 |
|
|
Age, Sex |
58, M |
52, F |
45, F |
|
Daily Suboxone Dosage (mg) |
4 |
8 |
12 |
|
Procedure Name |
Prostatic urethral lift |
Bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty |
Vaginal sling for stress incontinence |
|
Procedure Length |
10 minutes |
4 hours, 36 minutes |
59 minutes |
|
PACU Length of Stay (hours) |
1.5 |
2.5 |
2.25 |
|
Intraoperative Analgesics Administered |
none |
100 mcg fentanyl 75 mcg of 2% lidocaine |
100 mcg fentanyl 100mg of 2% lidocaine |
|
Post-op Analgesics Administered |
none |
none |
30 mcg sublingual sufentanil* 800 mg IV ibuprofen* |
|
Medications Prescribed for Discharge |
Acetaminophen, PRN |
Acetaminophen, PRN |
Acetaminophen PRN 5 mg immediate release oxycodone tablet, 6 times a day |
|
Pain score upon PACU arrival |
0/10 |
0/10 |
8/10 |
|
Pain score an hour after PACU arrival |
0/10 |
0/10 |
2/10* |
|
Pain Score 24 hours after discharge |
0/10 |
No contact made |
5/10** |
Discussion
While the results of the 3 cases cannot be taken as conclusive evidence of sublingual sufentanil efficacy in opioid-tolerant patients, it demonstrates an important option for pain management for patients on varying doses of suboxone. All three patients treated had no adverse effects and tolerated recovery room pain well. It is worth noting that in the patient who experienced the most pain, sufentanil administration was effective in lowering the pain from 10/10 to a 2/10. When completing a follow up call, after sufentanil has been cleared, pain control was no longer adequate. The contrasting minimal need for analgesia is novel due to numerous previous case reports reporting a high level of difficulty and complication when treating patients on buprenorphine.
|
Case Report |
Notable Findings regarding difficult post-operative pain control |
|
McCormick, et. al. (13) |
Required hydromorphone PCA at 0.8 mg with a 15 minute lockout. Patient was transferred to oral opioids after pain plateaued at 3/10 2 days after surgery. Suboxone use had to be stopped. |
|
Huang, et. al. (14) |
Over 70 mg IV hydromorphone as well as oral opioids were needed to keep pain “tolerable”. Complete pain control was not successful until buprenorphine was stopped. |
|
Brummett, et. al. (15) |
High dose of opioids and dexmedetomidine therapy needed after spine revision surgery. At-rest pain was controlled but patient experienced 5/10 pain out of bed and had to be closely monitored in the ICU. |
|
Chern, et. al. (16) |
When stopping buprenorphine and transitioning to hydromorphone 5 days before removal of vaginal mesh and cystoscopy, a multimodal approach was still needed for controlled pain. |
While it is difficult to compare the expected pain from the varied procedures discussed in reports, the end results are worth noting. Pain management using sublingual sufentanil is fast, effective, and minimally invasive allowing for repeat dosing if needed. Its pharmacological profile allows for doses to be kept low, which limits the risk of adverse events such as respiratory depression. The treatment of acute pain plays a major role in preventing chronic pain development (17) While the patients on buprenorphine are already being treated for pain, preventing further chronic pain development in addition to their baseline helps keep medication doses constant and prevent quality of life changes.
Overall, further research is needed to attest for the efficacy of sublingual sufentanil in opioid-tolerant patients. However, the case report presented speaks for the benefit of individual consideration and implementation due to excellent pain management and lack of adverse events seen.
Conclusions
