Loading...

105 posters, 2 topics, 24 sessions, 264 authors, 71 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

2022 ACP Annual Session

2 - 5 November | Austin, TX

2022 ACP Annual Session banner

74

Management of a Repeatedly Fractured Monolithic Zirconia Complete Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Differing Implant Components

Part of Topic

Case Presentation

Introduction:

Complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses (CAFIP) have been shown to be a successful treatment option for patients with terminal dentition or those already edentulous. Many prosthetic complications of this treatment option can be minimized with proper treatment planning incorporating adequate prosthetic space and proper fabrication of a passive final prosthesis. The brittleness of zirconia mandates that the design criteria provide adequate prosthesis thickness of at least 12 mm, adequate passive fit and the absence of long spans and cantilevers. 1

This case report describes a male patient who was successfully managed after suffering from a mandibular midline fracture of two monolithic zirconia prostheses supported by five dental implants from distinct manufacturers.

Case Report: 

The patient, a 52-year-old male, presented in September 2021 with the chief complaint “I yawned and heard the bottom bridge crack.” The patient had a history of severe bruxism and was not compliant with occlusal guard usage. At the time of patient presentation, the mandibular zirconia prosthesis was removed and a copy-milled PMMA prototype prosthesis was inserted eliminating implant #30. The prosthesis was also reinforced with metal pins and autopolymerizing resin.  Prior to placement, the prototype prosthesis was verified for passive fit. Patient also received a temporary occlusal guard to wear with prototype prosthesis. Final zirconia prosthesis was inserted after a few months and patient was educated on the importance of regular occlusal guard usage.

Clinical Consideration:
·Provide adequate thickness to final prosthesis.
·Verify passive fit of prosthesis and address any potential misfit which may be attributed to diverse prosthetic components with different connections.
·Consider eliminating the distal implant in situations with repeated fractures to rule out the potential effect of mandibular flexure.
·Stress the importance of managing parafunctional activity and strict occlusal guard usage.  
 
Conclusion:
•The initial fracture of the mandibular prosthesis that occurred September 2020 was attributed to inadequate final prosthesis thickness around cylinders and misfit due to diverse implant components. The subsequent fracture of the mandibular prosthesis which occurred October 2021, is theorized to have been a result of inadequate prosthesis thickness around cylinders, patient’s parafunctional habits and lack of occlusal guard usage, and/or mandibular flexure. 
•Mandibular flexure is an important consideration in this patient but could not be attributed to a direct etiology in the presence of severe bruxism and prosthetic design issues.

 References: 

1.Bidra AS, Tischler M, Patch C: Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:220-224
2.Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P, Gauthier M: Clinical outcomes of full arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10 Suppl 1:35-45
3.Shuen C, Bidra AS. Management of Fractured Zirconia Complete Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis Caused by Misfit Due to Diverse Implant Components: A Case Report. J Prosthodont. 2021 Jul;30(6):465-472. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13348. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PMID: 33570229.
 
Patient Treatment History: 
 
•August 2016- January 2017
•Implants placed #21, 23, 26, 28 + immediate loading
•#21 and 28 Nobel Parallel RP 4.3x15mm
•#23 and 26 Nobel Parallel RP 4.3x11.5 mm
•Implants #1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 16 placed + immediate loading
•March – April 2017
•Fracture of Mx conversion around #4
•Fractured #11 tooth
•June 2017
•Mn conversion fractured and Mx temp cylinder debonded #4
•Fractured #7-10 conversion teeth
•June 2017
•#30 Straumann S WN tissue level 4.8x8mm implant placed
•May 2018
•Fractured prototype between implant #20 and 22, #9 I edge chipped
•Conversion prosthesis placed
•August 2018
•Fractured teeth #25, 26, 27
•Fractured I edge #8 and 10 in PMMA
•October 2018
•Final Zirconia Prosthesis Insertion
•September 2020
•Mn Zirconia Prosthesis Fracture
•“My bridge broke and is moving and is hurting my hums when it moves.”
•Fractured between #22-23 & #25-26
•December 2020
•Mn Zirconia Prosthesis Insertion
•October 2021
•Mn Zirconia Prosthesis Fracture
•Fractured between #25-26
•March 2022
•Mn Zirconia Prosthesis Insertion + Occlusal Guard
•October 2022 Follow-up WNL
2022 ACP Annual Session » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.