Loading...

203 posters, 14 topics, 5 sessions, 817 authors, 256 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting

May 18-21, 2024 | The Westin Copley Place, Boston, MA

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting banner

D160

Rates Of Dehiscence And Fistula Formation Following Anterior Palatal Reconstruction With Vomer Flap

Part of Topic

Craniofacial/Peds

INTRODUCTION

The Role of the Vomer Bone

Vomer flap reconstruction is a surgical procedure used to repair a unilateral or bilateral cleft palate. In this procedure, a flap of vomer mucoperiosteal tissue is mobilized and repositioned to cover the cleft. One side of the tissue remains attached to the bone to retain its original blood supply, while the other is sutured to the lateral nasal or oral wall. 


Advantages

1. The vomer flap is proximal, well-vascularized andprovides an effective nasal lining. 
2. Reduces size of residual cleft, nasalregurgitation, and risk of midfacial growthdisturbances.
3. Reduces velopharyngeal insufficiency by helping to normalize speech production.
4. Associated with reduced morbidity as compared to tissue taken from other donor sites. 

Disadvantages

1. The vomer flap provides limited tissue, which may not be sufficient to completely cover larger defects.
2. Risk of postoperative complications such as dehiscence, fistula formation, bleeding, infection, and flap necrosis due to compromised blood supply.
3. These may necessitate additional procedures.
4. The extended duration and complexity of vomer flap reconstruction surgeries translate to greater anesthesia exposure at a younger age.


METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all cleft palate repairs conducted by the senior author over a seven-year period. All patients who underwent vomer flap reconstruction prior to palatoplasty were assigned to the vomer flap cohort. Those who underwent palatoplasty alone were assigned to the control cohort.

Primary outcomes included dehiscence after vomer flap reconstruction (vomer flap cohort only) and fistula formation of the anterior hard palate (both cohorts). Fistula formation was assessed no sooner than three months and no later than one year after palatoplasty. All vomer flap reconstructions were performed using a superior-based flap technique.

 

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients met study inclusion criteria. Among these, n = 38 patients underwent palatoplasty alone (control group) and n = 20 patients underwent vomer flap reconstruction prior to palatoplasty (vomer flap group). 

Within the vomer flap group, 68% of cases had dehisced by the time of palatoplasty and were considered failures. Following palatoplasty, three of the 20 vomer flap cases developed anterior hard palate fistulas (15.00%) as compared to only one in the control group (2.63%). 


CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study documents high rates of both dehiscence and fistula formation following a superior-based flap technique, underscoring the significant impact that surgical technique can have on postoperative trajectory. Given these results, our institution has moved towards a change in methodology with adoption of an overlapping flap approach (Figures 3 & 4). While follow-up for recent cases remains ongoing, preliminary results suggest a significantly reduced need for surgical revision following this new technique. 

We suspect that the failures associated with the superior-based flap technique were due to the single-layer nature, edge-to-edge approximation of the mucosa. Instead, we posit that the overlapping approach may maximize contact between the two raw mucosal surfaces to provide the best chance for closure and healing.


The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.