Loading...

203 posters, 14 topics, 5 sessions, 817 authors, 256 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting

May 18-21, 2024 | The Westin Copley Place, Boston, MA

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting banner

D102

Cleft Lip Repair Compared Between Inpatient And Outpatient Surgeries: A Multi-surgeon Experience

Part of Topic

Craniofacial/Peds

Cleft Lip Repair Comparison between Inpatient and Outpatient Surgeries: A Multi-surgeon Experience


Introduction:

Great variability exists as to whether cleft lip (CL) repair is performed as an inpatient or outpatient surgery. Previous studies have examined the safety of performing CL repair as an outpatient procedure. This study’s aim is to investigate the authors’ institutional experience with CL repair to evaluate if there is an increase in complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions to the hospital when performing CL repair in an outpatient setting. 


Methods:

This study reviewed patients under one year of age who underwent CL repair between 2012 and 2023 at the authors’ institution. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative details, ED visits and readmissions within thirty days of surgery, and complications.

 

Results:

145 patients met inclusion criteria. When the surgery was performed as outpatient, there was no significant difference in returning to the ED (p = 0.767) or thirty-day hospital readmission(p = 0.447) compared to those who were performed as an inpatient. Ambulatory patients did not have more postoperative complications (p = 0.698) than inpatients. Bilateral cleft lips were more likely to be performed in the inpatient setting (p = 0.001).Patients selected for inpatient surgery had a significantly lower weight at time of repair (p = 0.033) Patients with a respiratory (p = .006), gastrointestinal (p = 0.004), or hematologic (p = 0.013) comorbidity had a higher readmission rate. Patients were also significantly more likely to be readmitted if they had a younger gestational age at birth (p = 0.005).

 

Conclusion:

There was no increased return to ED or readmission for patients undergoing inpatient versus outpatient cleft lip repair. CL repair can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with careful patient selection.


Purpose:

Expand on safety of ambulatory cleft lip repairs after careful patient selections at a single cleft center.


Key Results:

-Patients with comorbid conditions were more likely to be readmitted
-Younger GA was associated with increase readmission




Contact:

LAURA I GALARZA, MD PGY-4

LGALARZA@UMC.EDU |  601-984-5084

 




The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.