This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
875 posters, 25 topics, 3,440 authors, 1,061 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
March 25-28, 2026 | Tampa, FL, USA

P220
Bariatric
INTRODUCTION
Staple-line or anastomotic leaks after bariatric
surgery are uncommon but severe postoperative
complications leading to sepsis, prolonged
hospitalization, reoperation, and mortality
- Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging
offers real-time assessment of tissue perfusion and
has been proposed to detect leaks compared to
conventional assessment
- High-quality comparative evidence on the
effectiveness of ICG versus conventional methods is
lacking
- This study aims to systematically review and meta-
analyze comparative cohorts to evaluate ICG versus
conventional assessment for leak prevention in
bariatric surgery
METHODS
Conducted a PRISMA-compliant
systematic review and meta-analysis of
comparative cohorts published after 2019
- Included adult patients undergoing
bariatric surgery comparing ICG versus
conventional assessment for leak prevention
- Primary endpoint was 30-day leak rate;
secondary endpoints included reoperation,
bleeding, operative time, length of stay, and
mortality
- Risk of bias assessed using ROBINS-I tool
- Certainty of evidence evaluated with
GRADE methodology
RESULTS
Six cohorts comprising 888 patients were included, with 355
patients assessed using ICG and 533 using conventional
methods
- ICG assessment did not significantly reduce leak rates
compared to conventional methods (OR= 0.62, 95% CI= 0.22 to
1.78, I2=0%, P=0.37)
- Secondary outcomes including reoperation, bleeding, operative
time, and mortality showed no meaningful differences between
groups
- Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ICG group
compared to conventional methods
- Risk of bias was moderate in five studies and serious in one
study
- Certainty of evidence was very low due to observational design,
serious risk of bias, small sample size, and extreme imprecision.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence does not currently support a definitive
benefit of ICG over conventional methods for leak
detection in bariatric surgery
- Observational study designs, rare events, and small
sample sizes limit confidence in findings
- Larger, well-designed trials are necessary to clarify
the role of ICG
- Heterogeneity in ICG application techniques should
be standardized in future research.