Loading...

501 posters, 2 videos, 1 audios, 8 topics, 37 sessions, 395 authors, 307 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024

November 21-23, 2024 | Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 banner

6179

CRPS (COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME) IN A 73-YEAR-OLD FEMALE POST NEEDLESTICK INJURY: INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Poster Presenter

Mohamed Awad

Part of Topic

Medically Challenging Cases

Title: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in a 73-Year-Old Female Post-Needlestick Injury: Interventional Pain Management Strategy

Authors: Mohamed Awad, MD, Adam Betcher, MD, Ria Malhotra, MD, Sayed Wahezi, MD

Instituition: Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, Physical Medicine and Rehabiliation1

Introduction: 

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (formerly reflex sympathetic dystrophy/causalgia) follows trauma to a limb.

 

 

 

Budapest Criteria for CRPS Diagnosis:

 

 

 

Budapest 1 Criteria (Strict Diagnostic Criteria):

 

Primarily for research (more stringent).

 

Requires signs and symptoms in all 4 categories:

 

  • Sensory: Hyperesthesia and/or allodynia.

  • Vasomotor: Temperature asymmetry or skin color changes.

  • Sudomotor/Edema: Edema or sweating changes/asymmetry.

  • Motor/Trophic: Reduced range of motion, motor dysfunction, or trophic changes (skin, hair, nails).

 

Diagnosis:

 

  • Symptoms in ≥3 categories.

  • ≥1 sign in ≥2 categories during physical exam.

  •  

 

Budapest 2 Criteria (Less Strict Clinical Criteria):

 

  • Used in clinical practice (more flexible).

  • Same 4 categories as Budapest 1.

  • Allows diagnosis with fewer signs/symptoms.

  • Less stringent physical exam requirements.

  •  

 

Needlestick-induced neuropathic pain is rare but disabling.

 

 

 

Materials and Methods:

Informed consent obtained from the patient. Report contains no identifiable information.

IRB exemption granted per Montefiore Medical Center policy.

 

Case Study:

Patient Profile: 73-year-old female with severe left-hand pain.

Cause: Pain followed a needlestick injury at the antecubital fossa.

Onset: Pain began the day after the injury; attributed to nerve damage.

Symptoms: 

  • Swelling

  • Significant functional limitations (unresponsive to occupational therapy)

  •  

Examination Findings: 

  • Met Budapest criteria for CRPS

  • Exhibited:

  • Allodynia

  • Atrophy of intrinsic hand muscles

  • Vascular changes

  • Mild edema

  •  

Diagnostic Imaging: X-ray revealed osteoarthritis in the fingers.

Diagnosis: CRPS Type 3 secondary to needlestick nerve injury (left upper extremity).

Treatment Options Discussed: 

  • Spinal cord stimulation (SCS)

  • Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)

 

Future Plan: Patient opted for PNS targeting:

  • Left radial and musculocutaneous nerves

  • Ulnar nerve as an alternative

 

Follow-up Plan: Resumption of occupational therapy post pain control improvement.

 Discussion:

 

Risk of Injury: Venipuncture at the antecubital fossa may cause nerve injury due to close proximity of nerves to veins.

 

Rarity of CRPS Development:

 

Such injuries rarely result in CRPS, as demonstrated in this case.

 

Management Challenge:

 

Treating symptoms post-CRPS diagnosis is complex.

 

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS): 

 

  • Promising in managing CRPS-related pain.

  • Hassenbusch et al. study: 30 of 32 patients achieved ≥50% pain reduction with permanent electrode implants.

  • 63% reported good or fair relief after 2-4 years.

  • VAS pain scores improved from 8.3 ± 0.3 to 3.5 ± 0.4.

  • 20% returned to work.

 

Additional Findings:

 

 Cooney's research showed PNS improved pain, sleep, and psychological well-being in CRPS patients.

 

Case Implications: Highlights potential for needlestick injuries to cause chronic CRPS and the effectiveness of PNS for severe pain and functional limitations.

 

Need for Ongoing Evaluation: Continuous assessment and therapy adjustments are essential for optimal outcomes.

 

Evidence Quality: Most studies on PNS for CRPS are case series or reports (Level IV evidence), indicating a need for higher-quality research.

 

REFERENCES:


 

  1. Bruehl, S., & Warner, D. S. (2010). Anesthesiology, 113, 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e3db38

  2. Hassenbusch, S. J., et al. (1996). J Neurosurg, 84(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0415

  3. Hirata, H. (2014). Hand Surgery, 19(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810414400012

  4. Ramos, J. A. (2014). Braz J Anesthesiol, 64(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.003

  5. Xu, J., et al. (2021). Pain Physician, 24(2), E131-E152.





 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.