Loading...

501 posters, 2 videos, 1 audios, 8 topics, 37 sessions, 395 authors, 307 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024

November 21-23, 2024 | Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 banner

6087

THE IMPACT OF A FALSE-POSITIVE URINE DRUG TESTING RESULT DUE TO METHADONE/BUPRENORPHINE CROSS REACTIVITY: A CASE REPORT

Part of Topic

Medically Challenging Cases

Patient profile:

• 70-year-old female patient w/ hx of rheumatoid arthritis, hip osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and long-standing methadone use for pain management presented to our interdisciplinary pain clinic seeking to establish care after her previous provider relocated.

Management:

UDT ordered during onboarding for methadone weaning plan

• Urine Drug screening (UDS)results:

      -Consistent with methadone use

     - False-positive for buprenorphine

• Patient denied buprenorphine use

• CURES (Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System)database supported patient's claim

• Methadone not refilled during visit

• Repeat UDS yielded negative results for buprenorphine

 

•Cross-reactivity between methadone and buprenorphine in immunoassay-based UDS is a recognized phenomenon that can complicate interpretation[2]
•The CEDIA® Buprenorphine II Assay (Thermo Scientific) is used to detect buprenorphine and its major metabolites.
•This assay Identifies methadone as possible cross-reactant due to structural similarities and shared metabolites [5]
•Negative screening cut off at 100,000 ng/mL
•Previous studies indicate that methadone concentrations exceeding 320,000 ng/mL, can occur in individuals with chronic use, may lead to significant cross-reactivity [3]

 Cutoff level importance:

•Manufacturer (CEDIA® Buprenorphine II Assay) cutoff: 10 ng/mL

  - Many labs (including ours) use 5 ng/mL; increasing chances of false-positive

  - Increasing the cutoff from 5 ng/mL to 10 ng/mL enhances the specificity of the assay

Implications of false-positive results:

•Impact on patient care and provider-patient relationship [4]
•Potential for unwarranted suspicion of non-adherence or illicit drug use
•Risk of punitive measures or loss of trust


The possibility for a UDT to yield false-positive results due to cross reactivity between medications highlight the importance of awareness amongst providers regarding inherent limitations of testing, as false-positive results can significantly impact patient care in addition to the provider-patient relationship

23rd Annual Pain Medicine Meeting 2024 » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.