Loading...

206 posters, 13 topics, 5 sessions, 713 authors, 293 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

AAPS 104th Annual Meeting

May 2-5, 2026 | Lihue, HI

AAPS 104th Annual Meeting banner

D112

Patient Priorities In Breast Sensation Among Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction

Part of Topic

Breast Reconstruction

Introduction

  • Breast reconstruction restores form and function after mastectomy, but sensory loss is common
  • Up to 80% of patients experience sensory loss
  • Breast sensation impacts body image, sexual function, psychological well-being, quality of life, and satisfaction
  • Surgical strategies to improve sensation include nipple/flap innervation and nerve optimization (preservation, coaptation, grafting)
  • Limited data exist on which sensation types matter most to patients and how sensation influences decision-making


Objective

Assess patient priorities regarding breast sensation, its perceived importance in decision-making, awareness of nerve optimization, and associations with postoperative satisfaction


Methods

  • Online survey distributed via breast cancer communities (Breast of Us, Tower Collective, DIEP C Foundation Facebook group), April 2024–July 2025
  • Inclusion: Female, ≥18 years, history of breast reconstruction for breast cancer
  • Primary outcomes:
    • BREAST-Q Satisfaction with Breasts (0–100)
    • BREAST-Q Satisfaction with Information (0–100)
  • Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, multivariable linear regression (adjusted for age, cancer stage, income, mastectomy type, and time since reconstruction)


Patient Demographics

  • N = 235
  • Age: 55 ± 11.5 years
  • Time since reconstruction: 5 years (IQR: 2–11)
  • Race: White (90%), Non-White (10%)
  • Reconstruction type: Implant (49%), Free flap (50%), Pedicled (10%)
  • Cancer stage: 0/DCIS (18%), Stage I (34%), Stage II (29%), Stage III (15%), Stage IV (1%)


Consideration of Nerve Optimization

  • Aware and considered: 16%
  • Aware, did not consider: 5%
  • Not aware, would have considered: 54%
  • Not aware, would not have considered: 16%
  • Unsure: 9%


Discussion

  • Importance of sensation is heterogeneous: 26% rate it moderately/extremely important, while 24% rate it not important
  • Sensory priorities shift from pre- to post-reconstruction
  • Most patients were unaware of nerve optimization, yet many would have considered it if informed
  • Awareness and consideration are associated with higher satisfaction and decision confidence


Clinical Implications

Preoperative counseling should:

  1. Ask which sensations matter most to each patient
  2. Explain types of sensation (tactile, erogenous, thermal/protective, pain/pruritus)
  3. Discuss nerve optimization options
  4. Set realistic expectations and recovery timelines


Conclusions

  • Breast sensation is a critical but under-addressed component of reconstruction
  • Awareness of nerve optimization is associated with higher postoperative satisfaction
  • Improving preoperative education represents a modifiable opportunity to enhance patient outcomes 

 

aaps2026 banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.