Loading...

203 posters, 14 topics, 5 sessions, 817 authors, 256 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting

May 18-21, 2024 | The Westin Copley Place, Boston, MA

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting banner

P1

Evaluating The Impact Of Concurrent Risk-Reducing Gynecologic Surgery On Infection Rates After Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Part of Topic

Aesthetic Face/Breast/Body/ Body Contouring

Background

•Infection is one of the most significant concerns after prosthetic breast reconstruction.
•Patients, especially genetic mutation carriers, often undergo mastectomy and reconstruction concurrently with risk-reducing gynecologic operations (BSO, TAH).
•Studies suggest longer OR times and increased OR traffic can increase infection risk.
•Unknown impact of these concurrent procedures on SSI risk after tissue expander (TE) or implant placement.
 

Aims

To evaluate the impact of concurrent gynecologic operations and surgery sequence on SSI rates after prosthetic breast reconstruction.

 

Methods

•Retrospective review: all patients who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander or implant placement between January 2018-January 2023
•≥ 6 months follow-up
 

Results

Demographics

•424 total patients, and 730 breasts included (Figure 2)
•Demographics were similar between the concurrent surgery and no concurrent surgery groups (Table 1)
•Demographics were similar between the Gynecology first and Breast first groups (Table 2)
 

Post-Operative Outcomes

Concurrent Surgery vs. No Concurrent Surgery

•Overall infection rate, minor infection rate, major infection rate, and reconstruction loss due to infection were similar between groups.
•Reconstruction loss due to infection was also similar between both groups: 10% Concurrent, 5% No Concurrent (p=0.11).
 

Post-Operative Outcomes

Gynecology Operates First vs. Breast Operates First

•There was a pattern of higher infection rates in the Breast first group, but this was not significant (p=0.41).
•Reconstruction loss due to infection was similar between groups: 13% Breast first group, 7% Gyn first Group (p=0.41).
 

Conclusions

•Concurrent gynecologic procedures can be performed without higher infection rates after prosthetic reconstruction.
•Evaluating case order may represent a straightforward intervention to reduce SSI.
•As our sample size is small, data collection is ongoing to refine these findings.
 

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the breast outcomes database team: Daniel Soroudi, Aileen Gozali, Jasmin Wilson, Serena Bhaskerrao, Nisha Parmeshwar, Laura Barnes, Catherine Dugan

The AAPS 102nd Annual Meeting » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.