2,281 posters, 63 videos, 56 audios, 43 topics, 18 sessions, 6,174 authors, 2,323 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
RCOG World Congress 2025
June 23 - 25, 2025 | ExCeL London, UK
EP.1229
Working Together to facilitate Personalised Birth Choices as an MDT
Part of Topic
Hot topics (emerging research/issues) in obstetrics
Working Together to facilitate Personalised Birth Choices as an MDT
Barking, Havering and Redbridge Trust provides care for the residents of three diverse London boroughs; as well as providing healthcare services to people in south-west Essex. We operate from two main sites - King George Hospital in Goodmayes and Queen’s Hospital in Romford. We provide maternity care to around 7,250 women each year, making us one of the largest maternity services in the country.
As with many other services, we have seen an increase in requests for care outside of standard guidance, particularly from those who birthed during the covid pandemic. In early 2023, a new Obstetric Consultant joined the Trust, with an interest in provision of care to women and birthing people requesting care outside of standard guidance. The existing pathway was led by the Consultant Midwife for Midwifery-Led Care, with ad hoc input from Obstetricians.
A new MDT antenatal clinic was established to see women and birthing people requesting care outside of standard national and local guidance, run jointly by the Consultant Obstetrician and Consultant Midwife. Appointments were arranged to be double the usual length and run predominantly in person, with remote video or telephone options available to those who requested them for reasons of convenience or hospital-based trauma.
In the first 15 months of the service, 93 women and birthing people were cared for by the Birth Choices MDT. The most common reason for referral was seeking a VBAC in a low risk setting (MLU or at home). Other common reasons for falling outside of current guidance were raised BMI, maternal age, declining IOL, previous PPH, large/multiple fibroids, diabetes and other maternal medical conditions.
Ages ranged from 20-49 years old. Reasons for seeking care outside of guidance included birth trauma, previous sexual assault, neurodivergence, and positive experience of family or friends.
Ethnicity of service users choosing birth outside guidance was generally representative of the ethnicities of all users of our maternity services. However, only two service users required the use of interpreting services, considerably lower than the average across our maternity services.
38 women and birthing people chose to attempt VBAC in a low risksetting. 20 achieved vaginal birth, 10 had a CS for maternal choice and 8 had a CS for obstetric indications. There were no cases of uterine rupture.
Perinatal morbidity and mortality – there were no IUDs or NNDs. There were no NICU admissions.
Feedback from service users was universally positive. This was the case even when birth outcomes were not in alignment with the original preferences. Service users reported feeling listened to and their choices respected.
Feedback from staff was also positive. Some Community Midwives felt that the current format for birth plans is too lengthy as it currently includes documentation of antenatal counselling as well as final preferences.
Future work includes further publicising the service, and wider work around informed consent and personalised care across the department.
