Loading...

2,281 posters, 63 videos, 56 audios, 43 topics, 18 sessions, 6,174 authors, 2,323 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

RCOG World Congress 2025

June 23 - 25, 2025 | ExCeL London, UK

PP.0066

Inequalities in Access to Obstetric Analgesia in the UK: A Systematic Review

Part of Topic

Hot topics (emerging research/issues) in obstetrics

Inequalities in Access to Obstetric Analgesia in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Literature Review

Linta Nasim1 and Dr Jacqueline Woodman (Supervisor)2

University of Warwick Medical School 2. University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire

Introduction

Childbirth is often the most intense pain a woman may experience, yet access to pharmacological obstetric analgesia in the UK remains a challenge. Social factors, National Health Service (NHS) strain, and lack of patient awareness contribute to lower anaesthesia use compared to other high-income countries. Recent reports highlight inadequate pain relief and discrimination against women of deprived and ethnic minority backgrounds. Unequal access contributes to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes and reflects NHS-wide failures. Research from countries like the US is often not applicable to the UK due to differences in healthcare systems and population demographics. This review is the first to look at inequality in access to obstetric analgesia in the UK.

Objective

To systematically review the extent of inequality in access to obstetric analgesia, contributing factors, and maternal care experiences in the UK.

Methods

  • Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched on October 31, 2024. After screening 1,401 articles, three studies1-3 met inclusion criteria (Figure 1, Table 1).
  • Included studies used observational designs, with two from England and one from Scotland, covering 6.6 million childbirth episodes and 20,633 survey responses.
  • Data were extracted using a proforma and synthesised via narrative analysis.

Results [Table]

Contributing Factors
 
Personal preferences and cultural factors alone cannot explain why women from minority ethnic and deprived backgrounds are less likely to receive obstetric analgesia, even when medically indicated and with 24-hour access to resources.
 

Disparities may reflect institutional biases towards women of deprived and minority ethnic background at 3 levels:

- Patient: information access, misinformation, education and language barriers

- Provider: personal biases, differential assessment of pain, negative attitude

- Institutional: birth location, resources available (e.g. interpreter, 24h analgesia acccess)

Strategies to tackle disparities include:

  • expanding interpretation & health literacy, patient education programmes
  • early pain management discussions,
  • non-engagement as a point of intervention - i.e. making every healthcare interaction count to support at-risk women.
Limitations
  • No Northern Irish or Welsh data
  • Coding errors in NHS data
  • Recalland non-response bias in the survey study
  • Survey did not include SES
Conclusion
 
Ethnicity and deprivation affect access to obstetric analgesia and maternal care experiences and the effect compoundst when women are from both demographics, even with a medical indication or 24-hour analgesic access. Future research should further explore underlying causes from all four UK nations.
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.