Loading...

167 posters, 28 videos, 9 topics, 12 sessions, 337 authors, 160 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

ISMICS 2023 Annual Meeting

31 May - 3 June, 2023 | Boston, MA

ISMICS 2023 Annual Meeting banner

PC39

Fast Track Extubation: How Effective On Patient Outcome?

Part of Topic

Valve - Surgical Valves

EARLY EXTUBATION , DOES IT REALY EFFECT ON PATIENT OUTCOME ?

Feras Khaliel, MD. PhD1, Zainab Alayed, MD1, Shatha Almutlaq MD1, Alsulbud Ahmed MD1, Fallatah, Faisal MD1, De vol , Edward

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiology, Department of Anesthesia, Heart Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center-Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Introduction:

Moreover, extubation within 6 hours has been shown to be safe and effective even in elderly patients, with no increased risk of reintubation. (2) Following cardiac surgery,

early extubation is a key step in the enhanced recovery pathway as it allows for early mobilization and a quick return to a regular daily activity. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of early extubation after Robotic assisted cardiac surgery (Ultrafast and fast track) compare to delayed extubation, and to assess the significant reduce ICU and hospital length of stay, Mortality rate , blood transfusion , reopreting for bleeding and readmission to ICU. The ultrafast track extubation is (Extubated in the Operating room), fast track extubation is (Extubated within six hours of ICU admission) and delayed extubation witch were done due to high risk patients , or Reluctancy from anesthesia- ICU team or at the beginning of program is (more than six hours).

Material and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of 184 patients were operated via Robotic assisted cardiac surgery in King Faisal specialist hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between February 2019 – 2022. The patients were divided into Three groups, ultrafast track extubation 41 patients 23% (Extubated in the Operating room), fast track extubation 16 patients 8% (Extubated within six hours of ICU admission) and delayed extubation 127 patients 69% (more than six hours). These three groups were compared interim of survival, hospital length of stay, number of blood transfusion and readmission to hospital and ICU.

Mean age of the whole sample were 49, majority of patient were female (66%), body mass index was as low as minimum10 kg/m2 and as high as 61 kg/m2 mean 28.9 ± 7.2 kg/m2, one third of the whole sample were having diabetes, hypertension and pulmonary hypertension, 10 % were on decompensated heart failure, tow third of the patient were having NYHA III-IV, 8.2 % were having chronic kidney disease and 1.6% of them were on intermittent hemodialysis.

Table -1 summarized the baseline characteristics for each group separately.

page1image272670592page1image272672704

After cardiac surgery, prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation have been associated with

page1image272677504

increased hospital and intensive care unit length of stays; higher hospital costs; and morbidity resulting

page1image272673280

from pneumonia and atelectasis. (1)

page2image272989184 page2image273378944

Table -1 Baseline characteristics

Age (mean ± st.d)
Female (%)
Body Mass Index (mean ± st.d) STS score (mean ± st.d) Diabetes Mellitus (%) Hypertension (%)
Chronic kidney disease (%)

Dialysis (%)
Decompensated Heart Failure (%)

page2image273371456 page2image273367808 page2image273379328 page2image273376832 page2image273374720 page2image273378176page2image273372992 page2image273371840 page2image273375680 page2image273378560 page2image273369344 page2image273371072 page2image273372032page2image273382592 page2image273380672 page2image273380480 page2image273381248 page2image273369728 page2image273373952 page2image273379712page2image273379520 page2image273370112 page2image273376064 page2image273375872 page2image273380096 page2image273372800page2image273382976 page2image273379904 page2image273368000 page2image273377024 page2image273381632 page2image273369536 page2image273377792page2image273374528 page2image273380864 page2image273381056 page2image273367040 page2image273372224 page2image273375296 page2image273375488page2image273368384 page2image273370496 page2image273374912 page2image273379136 page2image273367232 page2image273377600page2image273373376 page2image273369152 page2image273368960 page2image273376640 page2image273376448 page2image273376256 page2image273378752page2image273378368 page2image273373184

Atrial fibrillation (%)
Stroke (%)
Pulmonary hypertension (%)

P value

Variable
Age
Sex
BMI
STS score
DM
Hypertension Chronic kidney dis Dialysis

Decomp HF Atrial fibrillation Stroke Pulmonary HT

Ultrafast (n=41)

45+/- 14
63
28.4 +/- 5.9 0.87+/- 0.61 29

29 2.4

0 4.8

12 4.8 26.8

Fast vs Ultra

1.000 0.136 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.356 0.486 0.281 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.216

Fast (n=16)

44+/- 14 37
28.2+/- 8.3 0.93+/- 0.7 31

43 6.2

6.2 0

12.5 0 43.8

Ultra vs Delayed

0.064 0.438 1.000 0.001 1.000 0.573 0.192 1.000 0.164 0.0001 0.132 0.188

Delayed (n=127)

51+/-14
70
29+/- 7.5 2.34+/- 2.46 29

34.6 10.2

1.6 14

46.5 7.9 40.2

0.217 0.011 1.000 0.057 1.000 0.581 1.000 0.301 0.222 0.014 0.603 0.783

P value Ultrafast -fast vs Delayed 0.064

0.011 0.001- 0.057

0.0001 - 0.014

page2image272663296 page2image272672320 page2image272666368 page2image272663488 page2image272668096 page2image272674240page2image272673856 page2image272664448 page2image272671936 page2image272675968 page2image272669824 page2image272675392 page2image272669440page2image272676352 page2image272666944 page2image272671744 page2image272678656 page2image272668288 page2image272663104

Delayed vs Fast

page2image272664064 page2image272669632 page2image272662912 page2image272673664 page2image272669056 page2image272678464page2image272672512 page2image272672128 page2image272677120 page2image272678080 page2image272678272 page2image272671360page2image272676928 page2image272665984 page2image272675584 page2image272667904 page2image272675008 page2image272670208page2image272672896 page2image272665792 page2image272673088 page2image272675776 page2image272677696 page2image272666176page2image272666752 page2image272969728 page2image272966272 page2image272963008 page2image272962432 page2image272961088page2image272960320 page2image272971648 page2image272960704 page2image272958592 page2image272972992 page2image272965504page2image272970880 page2image272960512 page2image272959360 page2image272964736 page2image272965312 page2image272962816page2image272968192 page2image272958016 page2image272963584 page2image272965888 page2image272959744 page2image272958208page2image272968960 page2image272967232 page2image272959552 page2image272967808

Results:

performing ultrafast and fast extubation was applied at our institution since the beginning of robotic program to enhance post cardiac surgery recovery [fig-1].

Ultrafast

 
 
 
     
   

Fast

 
 
 
 
 

01jan2019 01jul2022

Delayed

page3image430606304

01jan2019 01jul2022

Graphs by Extubation speed group

Date of Procedure

Figure 1

Frequency

0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20

There were 4 readmission to the ICU in the delayed group and none for the other two groups (p=0.7), post discharge readmission and mortality were not significant among the groups ( p=0.9). when looking for hospital length of stay there was significant reduction in the ultrafast group compare to fast and delayed, 4 days vs 4.5 days vs 8 days respectively ( p= 0.0001) [fig-2].

page4image296631504 page4image273645760page4image273649408page4image273646720page4image273649792 page4image273652480 page4image273651712page4image273650944 page4image430802016 page4image273651520 page4image273654016 page4image430808624page4image430816240 page4image273656512 page4image273650560 page4image273657472 page4image273655168page4image273657088

Ultrafast Fast Delayed

page4image273654208

Figure 2hospital length of stay between the three groups ( p=0.0001)

Hospital LOS (DAYS)
0 20 40 60 80

Blood transfusion was also significantly higher with delayed extubation group when compare to ultrafast and fast group ultrafast required more than 1 unit of blood transfusion 21 patients, fast required more than 1 unit of blood transfusion were 7 patients, delayed required more than 1 unit of blood transfusion were 104 patients, 81.9% vs 51% vs 43.7% respectively.(p =< 0.0001). half of the patient from ultra-fast and fast group did not require blood transfusion compare with 18 % of delayed group (p= < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant in the survival between the three groups [fig.3].

page5image296726336

Kaplan–Meier survival estimates

page5image273432768 page5image430958992 page5image273435072page5image273435456 page5image296721856page5image272991168page5image272992320page5image272992512page5image272994624

0 365 730 1096 1461 Analysis time

page5image296724992

group_t = Ultrafast group_t = Fast group_t = Delayed

page5image273557056 page5image273553408 page5image273555712
page5image273652672

Figure 3 survival curve for the 3 groups

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

Discussion:

In this study we demonstrated that relatively simple post-operative ultrafast or fast extubation were associated with dramatically better performance, less hospital stay and less blood transfusion. Also, there are significant variables decreasing the odds of early extubation, including age, sex, renal function, and surgical status should be considered. In our study the mean age were 49 years old majority were female 66% and yet there is a significant (p = < 0.064) ultrafast vs delayed extubation, no matter the age or sex we still extubate the patients early. Also, we still early extubate high risk patients according to STS score we had significant (p=< 0.001) between ultrafast vs delayed and (p=<0.057) between fast vs delayed with no significant reintubation rate (p=< 1.000). in our study we notice the pulmonary hypertension as a risk factor it is not contraindicated for ultrafast/fast extubation. Atrial fibrillation patients benefit from ultrafast/fast compared to delayed (p=< 1.000) (p=< 0.014) respectively with no increased risk for stroke or bleeding. In one study the ultrafast track extubation protocol have the added benefit of being cost-free, suggesting that implementation of this type of pathway could be universally accomplished ((1), n.d.). Although the benefits of early extubation for all ventilated patients are recognized, few studies provide detailed postoperative protocols outlining how to improve performance ((2), n.d.). Studies that have examined methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation have focused on mixed medical and surgical patient populations, but in our study we focused on patients post cardiac surgery. A 1998 study by Micha-lopoulos and colleagues showed that certain anesthesia and sedation regimens could improve early extubation performance after CABG ((1), n.d.). A 2009 study by Sato and colleagues evaluated the effects of a standardized early extubation protocol on 485 on-pump CABG patients and found that early extubation could be performed successfully ((1), n.d.). In each study period, patients extubated early were reintubated at lower rates than overall patients within that period, suggesting that, in fact, we did not expose our patients to an increased risk of reintubation by our more aggressive extubation protocols. Finally, in our study There were different in reduce hospital stay and blood transfusion in ultrafast track extubation compared to prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Conclusion:

In Robotic cardiac surgery patients ultrafast track extubation significantly reduce hospital length of stay. Mortality, readmission to ICU and hospital were to be higher with delayed extubation. Despite the fact there was trend of ICU re-admission and hospital re-admission on the delayed group yet it found that it is not statistically significant due to low sample size.

References

1. (2020.). Cardiac surgery; Early extubation; Enhanced reco
2. (n.d.). Retrieved from A protocol-driven approach to early extubation after heart surgery : https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(13)01253-1/pdf

ISMICS 2023 Annual Meeting » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.