Loading...

241 posters, 10 topics, 7 sessions, 899 authors, 296 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

The AAPS 103rd Annual Meeting 2025

May 24-27, 2025 | Austin, Texas

The AAPS 103rd Annual Meeting 2025 banner

D155

Biosynthetic Versus Synthetic Mesh In Ventral Hernia Repair Among Oncologic Patients

Part of Topic

General Reconstruction

Title: Biosynthetic Versus Synthetic Mesh in Oncologic Ventral Hernia Repair

Background: 

•Ventral hernia repair in oncologic patients is challenging due to poor tissue quality, immunosuppression, malnutrition, and prior operations.
•Synthetic and biologic meshes offer advantages and disadvantages, including strength and resistance to contamination
•Biosynthetic mesh material, such as that composed of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB), represents an alternative to standard allo- and xenograft implants, and are designed to combine synthetic materials' durability with biologics' biocompatibility
•There is a lack of comparative studies directly evaluating outcomes of biosynthetic vs. synthetic meshes in cancer patients

Objectives:

Compare hernia recurrence and surgical risk factors in oncologic patients undergoing hernia repair with either biosynthetic or synthetic mesh reinforcement following prior abdominal or pelvic oncologic resection

Methods:

Study population:

Patients > ≥ 18 years of age

Retrospective review, 2010-2023

Inclusion:

Prior history of abdominal or pelvic oncologic resection, which was complicated by hernia development and subsequently underwent repair with either biosynthetic or synthetic mesh

Conclusion;

•Biosynthetic & Synthetic mesh are both effective options for ventral hernia repair in oncologic patients
•Retrorectus mesh placement and bilateral component separation are critical in reducing hernia recurrence risk in oncologic hernia repair
•Radiation increases the risk of hernia recurrence following repair
 
References:
1.Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Petro CC, et al. Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA surgery. 2022;157(4):293-301.
2.Harris HW, Primus F, Young C, et al. Preventing recurrence in clean and contaminated hernias using biologic versus synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair: the PRICE randomized clinical trial. LWW; 2021.
3.Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J. Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(4):578-585. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7
4.Song Y, Shannon AB, Roses RE, Fraker DL, Kelz RR, Karakousis GC. National trends in ventral hernia repairs for patients with intra-abdominal metastases. Surgery. Sep 2020;168(3):509-517. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.005


aaps2025 banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.