4,068 posters, 219 videos, 101 topics, 69 sessions, 14,365 authors, 6,128 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
Alzheimer's Association International Conference 2026
July 12-15, 2026 | London, United Kingdom, and Online

13480
Frontline Perspectives On The Real-world Use Of Blood-based Biomarkers In Alzheimer’s Disease
Poster Presenter
Authors
Kimberly Petro, Ryan S. Drake, Leah Zullig, Alison B. Allen, James E. Galvin, Douglas Galasko, Soeren Mattke, Michelle M. Mielke, Marwan Noel Sabbagh, Nicholas J. Giordano, Courtney Adams, Feride Frech, Daryl Rhys Jones
Affiliations
Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA, Roaring Fork Neurology, Basalt, CO, USA, NeuroCare Center, Inc., Canton, OH, USA, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Premier Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Part of Topic
Biomarkers -> Biomarkers (non-neuroimaging) -> Fluid biomarkers
Summary:
Multi-site implementation science survey evaluating frontline clinician and support staff perceptions of using blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) to confirm amyloid pathology in routine Alzheimer's disease care across diverse US clinical settings. Participants reported high acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of BBM implementation, with strong support for their integration into existing clinical workflows and use in patients with intermediate or high suspicion of Alzheimer's disease.
Keywords:
- Blood-based biomarkers (BBMs)
- Alzheimer's disease (AD)
- Amyloid pathology
- Confirmatory biomarkers
- Biomarker implementation
- Alzheimer's diagnosis
- Cognitive symptoms
- Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
- Amyloid testing
- Clinical practice guidelines
- Implementation science
- Real-world evidence (RWE)
- Acceptability
- Appropriateness
- Feasibility
- Implementation outcomes
- Frontline perspectives
- Healthcare provider perceptions
- Workflow integration
- Clinical adoption
- Organizational readiness
- Implementation barriers and facilitators
- Practice transformation
Comments
Email is required but is not shown publicly.
Loading comments...
