Loading...

4,068 posters, 219 videos, 101 topics, 69 sessions, 14,365 authors, 6,128 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

Alzheimer's Association International Conference 2026

July 12-15, 2026 | London, United Kingdom, and Online

Alzheimer's Association International Conference 2026 banner

7066

Disentangling Synaptic Degeneration And Structural Neurodegeneration Across The Alzheimer’S Disease Continuum

Poster Presenter

Carolina Soares

Part of Topic

 Background: Synaptic degeneration is closely linked to cognitive impairment in AD and mayprecede structural neurodegeneration. CSF total tau, though commonly viewed as a neuronalinjury marker, more closely reflects synaptic dysfunction than brain atrophy. We tested whetherseparating synaptic from structural neurodegeneration improves clinical risk stratification acrossthe AD continuum.Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from 1,217 ADNI participants (mean age 73±7.2 years)spanning the AD continuum (CU=440, MCI=556, AD dementia=221). Synaptic degeneration (S)was defined using synaptic protein, CSF total tau, and neurodegeneration (N) was measured byhippocampal volume below the 5th percentile of CU-Aβ-negative individuals, yielding four S/Nprofiles (S-N-, S+N-, S-N+, S+N+). Group differences were assessed using adjusted linearmodels, and risk of cognitive decline measured by CDR-sum-of-boxes was evaluated usingadjusted Cox proportional hazards models.Results: Participants were classified at baseline as S-N- (45%, n=549), S+N- (26%, n=323),S-N+(11%, n=129), or S+N+(18%, n=216) (Table 1).CU-Aβ-negative individuals were predominantlyS-N-(73%), whereas CU-Aβ-positive showed enrichment of S+N- of 30% (Fig.1a). Among CI-Aβ-negative individuals, S-N- remained most common (59%), while CI-Aβ-positive individualsshowed marked predominance of S+N+(33%) and S+N- (31%), with S-N- reduced to 22%. Baselinecognition was best in S-N- and worst in S+N+ across memory, language, and executive domains(Fig.1b). At last follow-up, S/N classifications were largely stable, but S+N- individuals showedthe lowest stability (55%) and the highest likelihood of progressing to combined pathology(S+N+)(Fig.2a). Over 6 years, risk of cognitive decline differed by S/N group (log-rank P<0.0001)(Fig.2b).Compared with S-N-, adjusted hazard ratios were 3.81 for S+N-, 4.13 for S-N+, and6.72 for S+N+ (Fig.2c).Four-year absolute risk was 8.7% in S-N-, 24.8% in S+N, 27.1% in S-N+,and 45.8% in S+N+ (Fig.2d).Conclusion: Distinguishing synaptic from structural neurodegeneration improves riskstratification and prediction of cognitive decline across the AD continuum, extending currentneurodegeneration markers and refining biological staging of disease progression. Thus, the S/Nframework provides a pragmatic basis for prognostic enrichment, with potential to increaseefficiency of predicting disease progression in early stages of the disease.

Comments

Email is required but is not shown publicly.

Loading comments...

aaic2026 banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.