Skip to main content
201 posters, 30 sessions, 674 authors
ePostersLive®
by SciGen® Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
Back
2026 AO Annual Meeting
Main menu
Home
Posters by Code
Posters by Title
Authors
Sessions
Videos
Previous Meetings
Search
Thu, 6:30 - 7:40 PM, Monitor 3
Start Session
The Poster has not been submitted by the Author.
P65
Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report.
Hector Flores Soto
,
Jorge Gil Valdez
,
Valentina Garcia-Lee
Poster Presenter:
Hector Flores Soto
Select rating
Give Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report. 1/5
Give Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report. 2/5
Give Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report. 3/5
Give Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report. 4/5
Give Bridging Workflows: The Influence of the Pickup Technique on Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses: A Protocol From Analog to Digital in the Modern Era: A Case Report. 5/5
Cancel rating
No votes yet
View Poster
P66
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft
Katherine Flynn
,
HimaBindu Dukka
,
Ryan Johnson
,
Scott Newman
,
Andrew Race
Poster Presenter:
Katherine Flynn
Select rating
Give Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft 1/5
Give Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft 2/5
Give Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft 3/5
Give Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft 4/5
Give Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Alloplast Graft Versus Combination of Mineralized/Demineralized Putty Allograft 5/5
Cancel rating
No votes yet
View Poster
P67
Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up
Shunsuke Fukuba
,
Jan Cosyn
,
Franz Strauss
,
Axelle Ickroth
,
Alfonso Gil
,
Thomas Bruyckere
,
Ronald Jung
,
Miha Pirc
,
Daniel Thoma
Poster Presenter:
Shunsuke Fukuba
Select rating
Give Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up 1/5
Give Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up 2/5
Give Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up 3/5
Give Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up 4/5
Give Clinician and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Early Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation; 1-year Follow Up 5/5
Cancel rating
No votes yet
The Poster has not been submitted by the Author.
P68
Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study
Rishita Garg
Poster Presenter:
Rishita Garg
Select rating
Give Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study 1/5
Give Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study 2/5
Give Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study 3/5
Give Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study 4/5
Give Artificial Intelligence–driven Predictive Models for Optimizing Dental Implant Outcomes: A Clinical Data–based Study 5/5
Cancel rating
No votes yet
View Poster
P69
Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form
Ghazal Ghassemi
Poster Presenter:
Ghazal Ghassemi
Select rating
Give Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form 1/5
Give Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form 2/5
Give Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form 3/5
Give Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form 4/5
Give Accuracy of Surveyed Crown Design Duplication with CAD/CAM Technology Compared with Conventional Methods in Partially Edentulous Kennedy Class III Arch Form 5/5
Cancel rating
No votes yet
Enter Poster Code (e.gGoNextPreviousCurrent
