Loading...

477 posters, 14 topics, 2,065 authors, 1,055 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

The Joint EBJIS-MSIS 2026 Conference

17 - 19 September, 2026 | Porto, Portugal

The Joint EBJIS-MSIS 2026 Conference banner

EP408

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) Analysis for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Part of Topic

Prosthetic Joint Infections

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR)

Analysis for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

 

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects at least 2% of joint replacements and is a growing

clinical and economic burden as arthroplasty volumes rise. Synovial white blood cell count

remains the diagnostic gold standard, but soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor

(suPAR) — an inflammation marker already used in sepsis and cardiac disease — has never been

evaluated in synovial fluid.

This study investigates whether suPAR in blood plasma and synovial fluid can serve as a diagnostic

biomarker for PJI, using the EBJIS criteria as reference standard.

Methods

Study design: Retrospective single-centre cohort, Jan 2019–Oct 2021; 60 adult patients, 67 joint

punctures (knee 82%, hip 16%, shoulder 2%)

Case definition: PJI classified per European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria by a

blinded assessor

Laboratory analyses: Blood: WBC (whole blood), CRP (plasma), suPAR (plasma) · Synovial fluid: suPAR

(ELISA)

Statistical approach: ROC analysis; optimal cut-offs by Youden’s J; diagnostic performance reported as

PPV and NPV

Results

Of 67 samples, 43 (64%) met EBJIS criteria for PJI and 24 (36%) were PJI-negative. Synovial cell

count, plasma CRP, and synovial suPAR were all significantly higher in infected joints (p ≤ 0.002);

plasma WBC and plasma suPAR did not differ between groups (p ≥ 0.132).

Conclusion

▪ Synovial suPAR shows solid diagnostic performance, comparable to plasma CRP, and may serve as an

alternative or complementary biomarker for PJI.

▪ Plasma suPAR was highly specific but poorly sensitive — not suitable as a stand-alone screening test.

▪ An automated, non-cytological suPAR assay could shorten laboratory turnaround versus manual

synovial cell counting.

▪ Findings require validation in larger, prospective, multi-centre cohorts.

 

K E Y T A K E A W A Y

Synovial suPAR performs on par with plasma CRP and needs no cytology expertise — a fast,

objective candidate to complement synovial cell count in PJI work-up.

ebjis-msis2026 banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.