Loading...

171 posters, 10 topics, 5 sessions, 690 authors, 211 institutions

ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.

American Association of Plastic Surgeons Meeting 2022

April 9 - 12 | San Diego, California

American Association of Plastic Surgeons Meeting 2022 banner

P68

Casting An Eye On Fibrous Dysplasia Of The Orbit

Part of Topic

Craniofacial/Peds

Casting an Eye on Fibrous Dysplasia of the Orbit

INTRODUCTION

Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a benign fibro-osseous tumor of growing bone in which fibrous tissue replaces normal medullary bone. [1]

FD is attributed to a somatic mutation in the GNAS protein that results in proliferation of undifferentiated skeletal progenitor cells. The resultant bone in prone to overgrowth, deformation, and encroachment.

The symptoms resulting from craniofacial FD are dependent on the amount and location of disease. Amongst the most feared complications is optic nerve compression causing optic neuropathy and threatening visual deterioration and blindness.

Surgical intervention for FD of the orbit (FDO) (Fig. 1) involves orbital unroofing and optic nerve decompression, yet controversy has surrounded the timing and indication for this procedure (prophylactic vs. therapeutic treatment). [2,3]

Given the rarity of FD and the heterogeneity of its treatment course (Fig. 2), there is a paucity of data describing the progression of FDO and comparing the long-term outcomes of different surgical approaches.

OBJECTIVES

The presence of FDO threatens compressive optic neuropathy and irreversible vision loss. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively characterize the natural history of FDO and describe the longitudinal outcomes of 36 patients who underwent stratified surgical management (Fig. 3) at a single institution.

METHODS

Population

•ICD-10-CM codes for monostotic and polyostotic fibrous dysplasia
 

Inclusion criteria:

1. Orbital involvement confirmed on CT

2. Histopathological confirmation of FD

3. Evaluation by neuro-ophthalmology and plastic surgery

Exclusion criteria:

1. Non-FD bone tumor

2. Lack of orbital involvement

3. Insufficient medical records

Analysis

•Comparative testing
•Fisher’s exact test/chi-squared test
•Independent samples t-test
•Sub-group analysis with McCune Albright Syndrome (MAS) vs. without
 
•Predictive testing
•Linear regression
•Logistic regression
 

RESULTS

164 CT scans analyzed

Age at diagnosis: 10.6 ± 4.8 years (0.7 – 18.8 years)

Timespan covered by CT: 3.8 ± 4.4 years (0.7 – 16.7 years)

In-person follow-up duration: 5.4 ± 4.7 years (0.15 – 16.6 years)

Five patients (13.9%) with MAS

Imaging of the Orbit

72 orbits belonging to 36 patients

•No facial growth without orbital growth
•36 orbits (50%) with partially encased optic nerves
•30 optic nerves 100% encased
•Patients with complete encasement diagnosed significantly younger (8.8 years vs. 12.4, p = .025)
•Complete encasement did not predict orbital decompression (p = .298)
 

McCune Albright Syndrome

•MAS patients diagnosed significantly younger (4.1 vs. 11.5), p < .001
 
•No significant difference between groups in…
•Number of operations
•Incidence of optic neuropathy
•Number of optical canal decompressions
 

Surgical Intervention

•50% of patients, at least one orbital decompression surgery
•Average age at optic canal decompression: 12.8 ± 3.3 years
•Younger age at diagnosis à more total operations
•Younger age at diagnosis à younger age at optic canal decompression
 

Visual Outcomes

•100% of patients with stable or improved vision
•Extraocular symptoms

     -ptosis/supraorbital nerve palsy (38.5%)

•Younger diagnosis à significantly increased risk of “stable” vision loss

     -(95% CI [.466 - .960], p = .029)

     -MAS was not a predictor in this model

CONCLUSION

1. No craniofacial FD growth in the absence of orbital FD growth

2. Progressive disease but complete encasement does not predict optic neuropathy

3. Therapeutic decompression of the optic canal using our surgical algorithm resulted in favorable visual outcomes

4. Across the board, younger diagnosis leads to worse outcomes

-↑ surgeries
-earlier decompression
-worse visual outcomes
 

REFERENCES

1.Bertin H, Huon JF, Guillot P, et al. Fibrous dysplasia of the orbital region: Series of 12 cases and review of the literature. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020;43(6):467-476. doi:10.1016/J.JFO.2019.10.012
2.Chen YR, Breidahl A, Chang CN. Optic nerve decompression in fibrous dysplasia: indications, efficacy, and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(1):22-33. doi:10.1097/00006534-199701000-00004
3.Cutler CM, Lee JS, Butman JA, et al. Long-term outcome of optic nerve encasement and optic nerve decompression in patients with fibrous dysplasia: risk factors for blindness and safety of observation. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(5):1011-1017. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000254440.02736.E3
 
American Association of Plastic Surgeons Meeting 2022 » banner
Copyright © 2015-2026, ePostersLive® SciGen is a registered trademark of SciGen Technologies S.A. Patent pending.

This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.